June 9, 2015
DENVER – The Denver Police Department announced this morning that it has officially changed its policy regarding officers shooting at moving vehicles. Under the new policy, officers can no longer fire on a moving vehicle because they believe that the vehicle is being used as a weapon. Officers are also instructed to use good judgment and stay out of the path of moving vehicles.
The ACLU of Colorado called for similar changes to the Department’s policy, as well as more effective training for officers, at a press conference held days after Denver police officers shot and killed 17-year-old Jessie Hernandez.
Today, ACLU of Colorado Executive Director Nathan Woodliff-Stanley issued the following statement:
“The ACLU of Colorado is encouraged that the Denver Police Department will follow the trend of departments throughout the country and no longer allow its officers to consider a vehicle as a weapon in order to justify firing on the driver. Safety and common sense dictate that officers should get out of the way of a moving vehicle rather than using potentially deadly force on the occupants. As the new policy correctly states, ‘shooting at moving vehicles is dangerous because it rarely stops a vehicle and disabling a driver creates an out-of-control car that is also a danger.’
“It is unfortunate that it took four officer-involved shootings at moving vehicles in less than a year, including the killing of unarmed 17-year-old Jessie Hernandez, for the Denver Police Department to finally make this change. It is imperative, in order to prevent more unnecessary deaths and injuries, that every officer is fully trained and held accountable to the new directives of this policy.”
June 5, 2015
Statement of ACLU of Colorado Executive Director Nathan Woodliff-Stanley:
“In what has become a disturbingly predictable pattern, Denver District Attorney Mitch Morrissey has once again refused to bring charges against Denver law enforcement officers following a police-involved killing, in this case the January 26th shooting of 17-year-old Jessie Hernandez.
“Beyond the obvious questions about conflict of interest, it is impossible to trust the objectivity of Mr. Morrissey, given that he has not filed a single indictment following an officer-involved shooting during his tenure as District Attorney.
“In 2011, the ACLU of Colorado called on the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate the Denver Police Department’s ‘pattern and practice’ of using excessive force and violating the civil rights of Denver residents. We once again renew that call today.
“A full independent review is necessary, now more than ever, as the community has lost its faith in Denver’s ability to hold police accountable in use-of-force cases.”
Date
Friday, June 5, 2015 - 3:00pmShow featured image
Hide banner image
Tweet Text
Related issues
Show related content
Menu parent dynamic listing
Style
June 2, 2015
WASHINGTON — The Senate passed the USA Freedom Act today, a bill to amend the Patriot Act’s Section 215 and other surveillance authorities.
Jameel Jaffer, American Civil liberties Union deputy legal director, had this reaction:
“The passage of the USA Freedom Act is a milestone. This is the most important surveillance reform bill since 1978, and its passage is an indication that Americans are no longer willing to give the intelligence agencies a blank check. It’s a testament to the significance of the Snowden disclosures and also to the hard work of many principled legislators on both sides of the aisle. Still, no one should mistake this bill for comprehensive reform. The bill leaves many of the government’s most intrusive and overbroad surveillance powers untouched, and it makes only very modest adjustments to disclosure and transparency requirements.
“The passage of this bill is an indication that comprehensive reform is possible, but it is not comprehensive reform in itself. Over the next weeks and months, lawmakers must tackle the larger project of bringing the government’s surveillance practices back in line with democratic values. We hope the House will begin this project later this week by narrowing one of the administrative subpoena provisions that has been used for mass surveillance in the past.”
Date
Tuesday, June 2, 2015 - 3:06pmShow featured image
Hide banner image
Tweet Text
Related issues
Show related content
Menu parent dynamic listing
Style
Pages
