February 27, 2015
DENVER – The Fort Collins City Council voted this afternoon to repeal provisions of an anti-panhandling ordinance that is currently being challenged as unconstitutional by an ACLU of Colorado class action lawsuit.

ACLU of Colorado Legal Director Mark Silverstein issued the following statement:

“The City of Fort Collins has taken a positive and welcome first step by repealing the provisions of its panhandling ordinance that have been challenged by the ACLU and our clients, who engage in nonthreatening, nonaggressive requests for charity that are fully protected by the First Amendment.  We hope that today’s repeal means that they and all other peaceful solicitors will no longer be targeted by Fort Collins police.  Fort Collins can still rely on the provisions of the ordinance that we did not challenge to address truly aggressive solicitation without stifling free speech rights.
“If Fort Collins would agree to make today’s repeal permanent, we could be well on our way to resolving this litigation and putting it behind us. Fort Collins, however, has described today’s repeal as a temporary measure and has signaled that the repealed provisions may well be reenacted.  The repealed provisions violate the First Amendment, and their repeal should be permanent, not temporary.”

Date

Friday, February 27, 2015 - 5:00pm

Featured image

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Criminal Legal Reform Unhoused Peoples' Rights

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

21

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Show list numbers

February 17, 2015
Statement of the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado

“The American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado applauds Denver Police Chief Robert White and the officers in command during last Saturday’s protest for keeping the peace and not intervening in a way that might have caused the situation to escalate or become violent after two individuals illegally vandalized a police memorial.
“The ACLU of Colorado does not condone vandalism.  We advocate for peaceful forms of demonstration that do not break the law.  By all accounts, the vast majority of the protesters present at the demonstration exercised their free speech rights peacefully.  When two individuals did break the law, rather than jeopardize the safety of the officers on duty and the crowd of law-abiding protesters, police did not intervene and waited until after the demonstration to make an arrest.
“In April 2012, the ACLU of Colorado wrote to Chief White to request a review of department policies and procedures relating to use of force and crowd management after an attempt by police to take down a tent during an Occupy Denver demonstration provoked an unnecessary violent confrontation, resulting in the use of pepper ball guns and batons against law-abiding demonstrators.
“In this instance, we commend Chief White and the commanding officers for exercising restraint and not escalating the situation.  A public show of aggression by police at that moment would not only have risked the safety of all who were present, it would have further denigrated the already damaged trust between the public and law enforcement.”
Resources:

April 2012 Letter from ACLU of Colorado to Chief White: http://static.aclu-co.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/OIM.Rich_.4.12.2012.complaint.Website.pdf

Know Your Rights for Protests and Demonstrations: http://static.aclu-co.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Protests.pdf

Date

Tuesday, February 17, 2015 - 2:45pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Criminal Legal Reform Freedom of Expression & Religion

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

21

Style

Standard with sidebar

DENVER – The American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado filed a class action lawsuit this morning challenging an anti-panhandling ordinance that is being widely enforced by the City of Fort Collins in violation of the free speech rights of people who are impoverished and homeless, as well as street performers and non-profit canvassers.

According to the ACLU complaint, Fort Collins police have issued “dozens and dozens” of citations, vigorously enforcing an unconstitutional law that criminalizes peaceful, non-threatening speech and expression, including silent requests for charity from solicitors who simply display a sign asking for help.

“The ACLU does not object to a narrowly and carefully tailored ordinance that targets truly threatening, coercive or menacing behavior that actually interferes with the rights of others, but Fort Collins has gone too far,” said ACLU Legal Director Mark Silverstein. “The Fort Collins law and its enforcement have unjustifiably turned polite and harmless pleas for help into a crime.”

The challenged ordinance makes it illegal to solicit charity in any of 11 locations or circumstances, including from people over the age of 60 and people with disabilities, whom the ordinance defines as “at risk.”  The ordinance prohibits solicitation in the evening or within 100 feet of a bus stop or other locations.  According to the ACLU complaint, a review of citations reveals that police are not only broadly applying those parameters, but are also in many cases enforcing the law as if it were a complete ban on any panhandling anywhere in the city.

"The First Amendment applies to everyone, regardless of social status or economic circumstances,” said ACLU cooperating attorney Hugh Gottschalk of Wheeler Trigg O’Donnell LLP.  “It is clear that Fort Collins police and city officials are violating the First Amendment and engaging in a broad campaign to stop people who are impoverished and homeless from asking for charity on the sidewalks, streets, and other public places in the city.”

The ACLU’s clients include four named individuals who are homeless and representative of a class of people who want to engage in peaceful requests for charity that Fort Collins currently forbids.

The suit was also brought on behalf of Greenpeace, Inc., a non-profit organization whose street canvassers were recently warned by police that the ordinance prohibits their requests for contributions to the organization.

Nancy York, a 76-year-old resident of Fort Collins, is also a named plaintiff.  York objects to being classified as “at risk” simply because she is over 60 years of age.  She asserts that she is fully capable of deciding for herself whether or not to make a charitable donation to a person or a charity.

The ACLU of Colorado has a long history of opposing laws that target the homeless and limit speech protected by the First Amendment, including a successful challenge in late 2012 of a sweeping ordinance that designated 12 blocks of Colorado Springs as a “no-solicitation” zone.  The ordinance was repealed after a federal judge’s preliminary ruling found that it was “likely unconstitutional.”

Today’s lawsuit, filed in federal district court in Denver, requests a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction to stop enforcement of the ordinance.

Resources:

more on this case

Date

Tuesday, February 10, 2015 - 11:00am

Featured image

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Criminal Legal Reform Freedom of Expression & Religion Unhoused Peoples' Rights

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

21

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Show list numbers

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU Colorado RSS