Statement of ACLU of Colorado Public Policy Director Denise Maes

"Today's unanimous passage of Senate Bill 64 is further evidence of a growing consensus among lawmakers, prison officials, and civil liberties advocates in Colorado that warehousing prisoners with mental illness in long-term solitary confinement is a cruel, costly, and unlawful practice that unnecessarily jeopardizes public safety.
"The legislation, championed by Senator Jesse Ulibarri, solidifies and provides critical funding to implement reforms initiated recently by the Department of Corrections to provide adequate out-of-cell treatment for prisoners with serious mental illness, rather than sticking those prisoners in 23 hour-a-day solitary cells.  Treatment aimed at rehabilitation is critical, because 97% of today's prison population will eventually be back in our communities and live as our neighbors.
"The ACLU of Colorado urges swift action in the House to finalize this groundbreaking legislation and deliver it to the Governor."
Visit the Stop Solitary campaign page: https://aclu-co.org/campaigns/stop-solitary/

Out of Sight, Out of Mind – The Story of Sam Mandez: http://vimeo.com/78840078

Read our report on mentally ill Colorado prisoners in solitary confinement: https://aclu-co.org/news/co-prisons-continue-to-warehouse-mentally-ill-in-solitary-confinement

Date

Monday, April 14, 2014 - 12:48pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Criminal Legal Reform

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

21

Style

Standard with sidebar

Bill was heard by the Senate Health and Human Services Committee on April 10, 2014 and was passed out of committee 4-3

Thank you Madam Chair and members of the committee.  My name is Stephen Meswarb.  I am the Deputy Director of the ACLU of Colorado, and I am here to speak on behalf of the ACLU in support of Senate Bill 175.
The ACLU has consistently advocated for policies that support women’s decision making, advance women’s health and well-being, and ensure strong, healthy families. This bill does that.
In the last several years, we have seen the most significant state legislative attacks on reproductive freedom in decades.  In 2013, the ACLU and our allies battled legislation that sought to restrict access to the full range of reproductive health care in more than 30 states.
In some states, politicians are passing laws that ban most abortions; others are passing bills that block a woman from getting care for two or three days, or attempt to shame a woman out of her decision by requiring a doctor to give her biased, and often medically inaccurate, state-mandated information.  These restrictions are clearly designed as political interference in a woman’s medical decision-making and not part of a true informed consent process.
Colorado has been no exception.  Our state has seen its fair share of attacks on reproductive health care access, despite a long history of very clear support for reproductive freedom and privacy by Colorado voters.
In 1967, Colorado became the first state in the nation to liberalize its abortion laws, six years ahead of Roe v. Wade.  Since that time, our state’s voters have consistently and repeatedly strongly opposed attempts to inject the government into private health care decisions that should be made solely by women and their families, their doctors, and their faith.
In 2008 and 2010, Colorado voters rejected personhood initiatives by over 40-point margins, and we will face yet another such attempt this fall.  Each year, abortion bans and other attempts to limit reproductive health care are introduced, and fail, in this legislature.
This bill will stop Colorado from following the path of other states where politicians have interfered with women’s rights to an abortion and to private reproductive health care decisions.
With this bill, Colorado has an opportunity to put a stop to these out-of-touch and unconstitutional attempts once and for all. It will affirm the will of Colorado voters and ensure that every Coloradan has the right to make their own, individual, private reproductive health care decisions, in consultation with their doctor, not the government.
Deciding whether and when to become a parent is one of the most private and important decisions a person can make.  This bill would help protect a woman’s ability to make those decisions privately in consultation with her doctor and her family – and without political interference.
Government interference in reproductive health decisions does not represent the values of Coloradans.  The people of our state believe we should be able to make these decisions for ourselves without politicians and politics getting in the way.
For all these reasons, I urge you to vote yes on this bill.  Thank you for the opportunity to be here today.

Date

Friday, April 11, 2014 - 10:23am

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Reproductive Freedom Women’s Rights

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

21

Style

Standard with sidebar

 

 
The struggle to find drugs to carry out lethal injection has made headlines all over the country and was recently featured on Comedy Central's The Colbert Report.
Pharmaceutical companies who make these drugs have started to ban their sale for executions, and states are scrambling to find alternatives, with many dangerous consequences.
An Oklahoma execution made the news when the prisoner’s last words, after being injected with one of the drugs, were “my whole body burns.”  In Ohio, it took over twenty minutes to kill an inmate, while he screamed and struggled on the execution table.
Now some states are turning to compound pharmacies and other questionable means for getting the drugs they need.  They are masking this practice in secrecy and lawsuits are popping up all over the country in search of public disclosure.
Last year in Colorado, when Nathan Dunlap was scheduled for execution, the ACLU of Colorado filed a lawsuit to determine the state’s planned lethal injection protocol, the drugs that prison officials intended to use, and where those drugs were coming from:
https://aclu-co.org/court-cases/aclu-v-colorado-department-of-corrections/

Thankfully, Governor Hickenlooper, expressing several concerns with Colorado’s broken death penalty system, halted the execution.
Meanwhile, in Oklahoma, prison officials were bartering for drugs with Texas by offering to help if they threw the OK vs. TX football game:
http://www.coloradoindependent.com/146553/oklahoma-scrambles-to-find-lethal-injections-for-two-imminent-executions

And now Oklahoma is planning to use secretly sourced experimental drugs, despite a court ruling against their use:
http://www.coloradoindependent.com/146830/oklahoma-to-use-secretly-sourced-experimental-lethal-injections-in-spite-of-court-ruling

The Huffington Post has an excellent infographic calling this the “New Costs of the Death Penalty”:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/02/lethal-injection-drugs_n_4979654.html

As the nation deals with this lethal injection drug shortage, it is a good time to take a step back and evaluate whether the death penalty should be used anymore.  It is costly, unfairly applied, there is chance that an innocent person may be executed and now, it is hard to even follow through with the punishment.

Date

Thursday, April 3, 2014 - 12:14pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Criminal Legal Reform Government Transparency

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

21

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU Colorado RSS