ACLU Demands 31 Colorado Cities Repeal Unconstitutional Anti-Panhandling Laws

  • Latest Update: Aug 28, 2018
In the Courts, ACLU of Colorado logo on a blue background with a woman holding the scales of justice.

The ACLU of Colorado sent individualized letters to 31 municipalities with varied bans on panhandling, all of which were facially unconstitutional in light of recent court decisions.


In 2018, the ACLU of Colorado participated in a "Day of Letters" organized by the National Law Center on Homeless & Poverty (NLCHP) (later renamed National Homelessness Law Center). Advocates in a dozen states sent letters demanding that more than 200 cities repeal panhandling bans and redirect resources to housing and other support for people experiencing homelessness.

In Colorado, individualized letters were sent challenging ordinances in Aguilar, Alma, Berthoud, Blue River, Brush, Central City, Columbine Valley, Commerce City, De Beque, Del Norte, Estes Park, Fairplay, Frederick, Garden City, Granby, Idaho Springs, Julesburg, La Jara, Mancos, New Castle, Ouray, Palisade, Paonia, Pierce, Rangley, Timnath, Victor, Wellington, Windsor, Wray and Yuma.

An ACLU of Colorado letter campaign in 2016 prompted 34 Colorado cities to halt enforcement and repeal ordinances that made it a crime to "loiter for the purpose of begging." The 2018 letters addressed several flavors of unconstitutional of anti-panhandling laws, including ordinances that duplicated provisions found unconstitutional in earlier ACLU of Colorado litigation challenging ordinances in Grand Junction and Fort Collins.

The cities receiving the ACLU letters agreed to stop enforcement. Most repealed the challenged ordinances, while some amended the challenged ordinance and retained only provisions to which the ACLU did not object.


NLCHP Press Release:

"Nationwide Effort Calls for Housing, Not Handcuffs," National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty, August 28, 2018


Media:

Attorney(s):
Mark Silverstein and Rebecca Wallace