Millard v. Sloan

  • Filed: July 7, 2016
  • Status: Decided
  • Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Latest Update: Aug 20, 2020
In the Courts, ACLU of Colorado logo on a blue background with a woman holding the scales of justice.

In a groundbreaking ruling issued in 2017, federal district judge Richard Matsch declared that the Colorado statute requiring lifetime sex offender registry imposed cruel and unusual punishment on three convicted sex offenders whose cases the court heard in a bench trial. The civil rights case was litigated in the trial court by attorney Colorado attorney Alison Ruttenberg.


The Court found that the evidence showed that registered sex offenders “face a known, real, and serious threat of retaliation, violence, ostracism, shaming, and other unfair and irrational treatment from the public.” Judge Matsch concluded that these harms resulted “directly” from their status as registered sex offenders and was unconnected to any threat to pubic safety based on any “objective determination of their specific offenses, circumstances, and personal attributes.”

The district court issued a declaratory judgment holding that Colorado’s Sex Offender Registration Act (“SORA”), as applied to three plaintiffs, violated the Eighth Amendment. He further ruled, in the case of a fourth plaintiff, that SORA violated the Due Process Clause.

The Defendant, the Director of the Colorado Bureau of Investigation, which maintains the sex offender registry, immediately filed an appeal.

ACLU Cooperating Attorneys Ty Gee and Adam Mueller defended Matsch’s ruling in the Tenth Circuit.

In 2020, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s judgment.


Media:

Case Number:
13-cv-02406-RPM; 17-1333
Judge:
Hon. Richard Matsch
Attorney(s):
Mark Silverstein and Sara Neel
Pro Bono Firm:
Alison Ruttenberg; Ty Gee and Adam Mueller of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.